A number of our foregoing factors bring credence towards the contention one to metaphor was an enthusiastic analogous label. This will be corroborated from the St Thomas’ techniques under consideration 13 from the newest Prima Pars , once the in the blog post three, when he asks if any name’s told you properly regarding God, the fresh new resistance put towards the play are anywhere between need proprie and you can improprie towards latter identified having metaphor. Upcoming, inside article half dozen, when he asks in the event that labels preferred in order to Jesus and you may animals try earliest told you from creatures, the difference proprie/improprie seems to be a good subdivision from analogous identity. St Thomas begins from the proclaiming that “when you look at the omnibus nominibus quae de- pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur for each respectum post unum: ainsi que ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur inside definitione omnium. Ainsi que quia proportion quam significat nomen for each prius dicitur de eo quod ponitur when you look at the definitione aliorum, et for each and every posterius de aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant post illud primum vel magis vel minus.” This might be exemplified because of the dated credible, “fit.” “Sic for this reason omni nomina quae metaphorice de Deo dicuntur each prius de creaturis dicuntur quam de- Deo: quia dicta de Deo, nihil aliud tall quam similitudines advertising stories creaturas.” St. Thomas notices the newest similarity away from proportion ( similitudo proportionum ) intended in “smiling meadow” plus in getting in touch with God an effective lion.
As he continues to talk off other names “quae low metaphorice dicuntur de- Deo,” the newest clear feeling is that he or she is speaking regarding most other circumstances from analogous labels than just metaphors
Are there messages in which St Thomas opposes metaphor and you may analogy? If we turn-to brand new comments with the Metaphysics , we find St Thomas pinpointing “potency” on analogous and you will equivocal modes. “Potency” mode a number of things. “Sed ista multiplicitas quantum advertisement quosdam analogiae.” The new equivocal settings regarding effectiveness is exemplified in addition we talk about step three toward third electricity as well as new cube since energy of range. “Mais aussi propter hoc per quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens during the quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens during the rem” Again a beneficial proportionality see. Why these equivocal methods are indeed metaphors is obvious regarding the synchronous passing in-book Delta inside commenting on which St Thomas starts, “Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice.” What makes this type of modes metaphorical rather than analogical? “Their thus modis praetermissis, considerandum est de- potentiis, quae reducuntur advertisement unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, ainsi que omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur offer aliquid principium ex quo omnes aliae dicuntur.” In a nutshell, St Thomas right here opposes metaphor to help you analogous uses of a reputation given that second and not the previous involve a reduction in order to what exactly is generally denominated because of the keyword in question while, is always to it need pointing out, in the text of one’s Summa we noticed one minute ago, this new metaphor was not known regarding the expansion proprie about base. Or is it the way in which of the mention of what is principally signifed because of the identity which differentiates metaphor from example, use proprie how to write an essay in political science from improprie ? Something titled metaphorically is actually, at all, delivered to feel like just what term securely stands for.
Whatever you would be trying to find is some way of justifying the newest very popular differences of metaphor and example such that zero appeal is made to Cajetan’s section of example toward attribution and best proportionality
A keen aporia have certainly came up, therefore, and its quality can simply getting got of the determining what a metaphor is and you will just what an enthusiastic analogous name’s. Methods to this type of issues would be to permit me to understand the frequently conflicting comments out of Aquinas.