Defendant Viado recorded his Answer regarding a lot more than-titled cases. In the two cases he admits that relating to the submitting of one’s Petition to your Issuance of new customer’s duplicates out of TCT No. T-14466 and 14467, but rejects with caused the execution https://paydayloansconnecticut.com/murray/ off another strength out-of lawyer getting along with behalf of customers. He asserted that it was Marilou Soriano whom passed to help you your a ready petition which have annexes on that to own your in order to indication and you can afterwards having their own retained the advice so you can file into the courtroom. It plan was told me by Marilou Soriano and you can Viado possess arranged only when Marilou Soriano presented to your plaintiff Jacinto Soriano, then toward a controls chair, whom she brought once the his dad. While doing so Viado accessible to assist in reconstituting the shed titles to have a charge of P80,. Viado claims which he was just entitled throughout the Unique Fuel off Lawyer that has been already notarized and you may connected to the Petition, x x x.
Just after summons because of the guide, defendants Jose into the Municipal Circumstances No. 6210-R and you can Hufana in the Civil Instance Zero. 6211-Roentgen didn’t file its particular solutions. On actions by plaintiffs, Jose and you may Hufana was indeed .
New told you loan is shielded by a genuine estate financial over the fresh new TCT No
With its Answer when you look at the Civil Situation No. 6211-Roentgen, properly recorded promptly, BPI acknowledges paragraphs 1 and you will 8 of your Grievance and you will rejects all of those other situation accusations about Complaint. Part eight, pertains to this new plaintiffs denial that Petition towards the issuance of the latest customer’s copy content out of TCT Nos. T-14466 and you can T-14467 has been granted and therefore your order is approved claiming the user’s backup of one’s foregoing headings have been missing without force and you may perception. 14466 which have BPI on the amount of A couple Million Pesos. As a consequence of affirmative protections. BPI slates that it has dealt with Hufana completely a good trust, and thus, its a beneficial mortgagee in the good-faith entitled to the protection beneath the law. After that, they states that it is not necessary going beyond the five comers from Hufana’s name, and that for the their face suggests zero problem. The borrowed funds data was notarized documents which, underneath the law, are entitled to good expectation off regularity and you will validity.
Upon motion away from plaintiffs duly provided from the legal, an amended Grievance is actually recorded by plaintiffs impleading Maria Luzviminda Patimo once the accused within the Municipal Instance Zero. 6210-R.
With its Solution to this new Amended Problem, defendant Patimo rejects the materials accusations on Revised Ailment. As Unique and you can Affirmative Protections, Patimo alleged you to since , she are approached by accused Jose whom required financing and you may provided because the security TCT Zero. 85840. Just before going into the told you loan application out-of Jose, Patimo visited make sure and look these-mentioned name to your Check in from Deeds out-of Baguio City. 85840.
Came across there zero burden or any other liens into name provided by Jose, Patimo provided the loan taken out by Jose throughout the matter of one Million Peso
Inside the Municipal Instance Zero. 6210-Roentgen, the outcome is hereby dismissed concerning accused Patimo having lack out-of merit. At the time of defendants Jose and you can Viado, he or she is hereby purchased so you can solidarity pay the plaintiffs the amount of a single billion pesos given that and also by way of real injuries; three hundred thousand pesos as a consequence of moral damage; 2 hundred thousand pesos once the and by way of excellent damage; and you may twenty five [sic] thousand pesos given that attorney’s fees and to pay the price of the brand new suit.